Thank you for your quick reply.
Quote:BTW did you try using original Primer query for your task?
No, but because I'm trying to identify the region where this degenerated primers would anneal. So, I have the primers and I want to get the sequence of the product (but without primer sequences) from several sequences (~200). Now I was just annotating the position of these primers in all my sequences.
Quote:Did you use iterations in your workflow? If not, the resulting files will be merged into single genbank file. Genbank format supports having multiple sequences within it.
No, I didn't. But the program says that if you don't need to change the parameters for each sequence, is better lo leave it without iterations. But still, I can set the program to save separate files instead of merging them in one genbank file even without iterations.
Quote: Quote:Is it possible to use the original name of the sequence for saving the new one?
What do you mean by this? Do you want to rewrite original files with new content? Or do you want to keep original Genbank name (LOCUS and ACCSESSION) in result files?
Sorry, not clear at all. I want to save a new file in another folder, but using the original file name (genomeA.gb).
Thanks for the log info, I didn't know that I could change the level of detail...
Another thing, the files generated with the workflow designer are not correct after the second sequence. The first one is OK, when UGENE starts to add the extension 001, 002, etc. to the file names, then they start to have the sequence before the features. I'm attaching one so you can have a look.