Hi, Myckel
I've searched your sequence with our realization and with official JASPAR database search engine. Both ways I've got hits on ATGACGT (this, for example, result I've got on jaspar.genereg.net)

Also I don't think, that found subsequence is flase positive, cause bZIP910 matrix detects hits of ATGACGT and CTGACGT sequences (you can look at following Alignment Logo to check it):

I've checked if detection in complement strand is wrong and found that all is right here too. Can you provide some more information about wrong weight matrix search behavior, so if we really have mistakes in algorithm, we can fix it in the next UGENE release